I observed the interaction between an adult and a young child in
the office after school while the student was waiting for their parent to come
pick them up. The adult communicated with
the child effectively in a few ways. The
adult is the secretary, Ms. Ofelia and the child is a 5 year old TK student
named Eugene.
First, I noticed that the secretary greets the student by name as
he enter and the student reciprocates the gesture. This acknowledgment is a sign of respect and
shows the child that he in a safe place with a familiar person who cares. Ms. Ofelia asks him about his day and after
receiving the one word response of, “good” she extends his thinking by asking, “What
happened that made it good?” Using
language that extends children’s language that repeats and extends their
statements promotes children’s thinking (Rainer Dangei & Durden, 2010). She is acknowledging and validating his
answer but encourages him to tell more. Eugene
explains that his day was good because he got to play blocks and paint in his
class today. She then tells him that she
also had a good day and what happened that made it good. This exchange of information is effective because
children see that it is important to share and listen to others. Ms. Ofelia continues by explaining to Eugene
that her sons enjoyed playing blocks when they were younger too and how they
liked to build castles. She asks him
what he likes to build and he mentions that he likes to build cities. Ms. Ofelia listens and when he says the word “cities”
her eyes widen, her hands move toward her face and she says “wow what a big
thing to build!” Eugene smiles, her
reaction and body language makes him feel proud and have a positive sense of
worth. In the video, Lisa Kolbeck
advises adults to be receptive to what children are saying (Laureate Education,
Inc., 2011). Ms. Ofelia does this by
changing her tone, facial expression and using hand gestures to let him know that she heard his
ambitious preference in play. Just then
Eugenes mother arrives and Ms. Ofelia bids him goodbye with a wave and
smile. “Goodbye Ms. Ofelia” Eugene says
as he exits.
To make the communication more affirming,
Ms. Ofelia could have stated his name again when he left. She also could have engaged in a conversation
with his mother by explaining to her that she learned that Eugene likes to
build cities today. By continuing and
extending the topic of conversation with his mother Eugene could have seen how
communication can be integrated. Overall,
Ms. Ofelia also fosters Eugenes positive communication skills by asking him to
extend his thoughts and also offers her own thoughts. The entire interaction only lasted a few
minutes but it showed how effective communication with a child can be when the
adult listens and validates the child’s thoughts.
The communication I observed compares to the ways in
which I communicate with children in that I always try to encourage their
extended thinking. I teach a lot of
fluency and comprehension in reading. So
when I do guided reading I am supposed to check for comprehension about the
text that is very straight forward. Yet,
I always try to include questions that go beyond the text because from those
answers you learn more about each child.
I could improve my communication by asking more questions that promote
childrens thinking. Some examples of
cognitive challenges to ask the children would be to label, describe, explain,
connect to prior knowledge, compare, hypothesize, imagine possibilities and
offer an opinion (Rainer
Dangei & Durden, 2010).
Reference
Laureate
Education, Inc. (2011). Strategies for working with diverse children: Communicating
with young children. Baltimore MD: Author
Rainer Dangei, J.,
& Durden, T. R. (2010). The nature of teacher talk during small group
activities. YC: Young Children, 65(1), 74-81. Retrieved from the Walden Library
using the Education Research Complete database. http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=47964033&site=ehost-live&scope=site